Recent changes in Brazil’s legal framework aim to significantly alter the judicial system in São Paulo. A series of constitutional amendments, federal laws, and regimental changes at the Superior Court of Justice (STJ) and the São Paulo Court of Justice (TJ/SP) will shape the state’s legal practices.
The STJ implemented a “relevance filter” for special appeals through Constitutional Amendment 125/2022 and Law 15.484/2026. This filter reduces appeals by evaluating the significance of federal infraconstitutional law issues.
AI-Assisted Relevance Assessment
Regimental amendments 53 and 55 at the STJ mandate a detailed summary report for each appeal, covering facts, arguments, requests, contested decisions, and legal provisions. This enables the court to employ artificial intelligence in identifying inadmissibility grounds, further limiting appeals.
The STJ president’s inadmissibility decision can be re-evaluated, but reversals are rare. Exceptions to the filter include criminal cases, administrative misconduct, high-value claims, and cases impacting political eligibility.
Over time, these exceptions might be interpreted narrowly, similar to the “defensive jurisprudence” trend, potentially restricting STJ access further.
Read Also: Brazil’s real-estate tax advantage expires 2026
Consequences for Legal Professionals
These changes will likely solidify existing jurisprudence in federal and state courts, making it more challenging to contest decisions through appeals. Legal practitioners may need to reevaluate their strategies, as current case law might become less reliable for arguments.
The TJ/SP has also undergone restructuring, eliminating subsections within its Private Law Section. Previously, chambers had specific focuses, such as condominium law, professional fees, and property rental (25th to 36th Chambers) or commercial representation, banking contracts, and property possession (11th to 24th, 37th, and 38th Chambers).
Now, most chambers will handle a wider array of cases, except for four dedicated to family law and those specializing in business and environmental law. This shift will likely influence the court’s jurisprudence as chambers take on diverse cases.
For example, property rental cases, once managed solely by the 25th to 36th Chambers, will now be distributed among various chambers, potentially leading to inconsistent rulings.
These reforms, combined with the STJ’s stricter appeal process, create a significant transformation in São Paulo’s legal system. While the TJ/SP’s decision-making quality remains intact, these changes will affect litigants and lawyers, necessitating adjustments in legal strategies and client communication.
Many legal professionals may not fully comprehend the implications of these reforms. As the new system takes hold, they must stay informed and adapt their approaches to effectively work through the changing judicial system.
Read Also: Former ministers back Supreme Court chief
The São Paulo legal community faces a period of adjustment as these reforms take effect, requiring a proactive approach to stay aligned with the evolving judicial processes.
Legal practitioners will need to closely monitor the impact of these changes on case outcomes and adjust their strategies accordingly to ensure effective representation in this new judicial environment.
The distribution of property rental cases among various chambers highlights the potential for divergent rulings, emphasizing the need for legal professionals to stay informed about the evolving case law in this area.
As the STJ’s relevance filter and the TJ/SP’s restructuring continue to shape the legal environment, ongoing education and adaptation will be essential for legal practitioners to maintain their effectiveness in this transformed system.
The legal community in São Paulo must remain vigilant and responsive to these changes, ensuring that they are well-prepared to work through the complexities of the new judicial environment and provide the best possible representation for their clients.
